Post by account_disabled on Jan 10, 2024 11:33:24 GMT 1
grande and Omar Ferri Júnior, acting in their own cause, in an action against the state of Rio Grande do South. The state owes the couple R$2,000 in fees for executing the sentence in alimony action. The debt was included in the 2003 budget as a precatório, but was not paid. Lawyers owe the state R$1,400 in IPVA. Eunice and Ferri did not pay the IPVA for the two cars that were in the lawyer's name and went to court seeking compensation for the tax with the court order that was owed to the lawyer. At the end of 2003, the Court ruled in their favor and Eunice and Ferri, even without paying the IPVA, were assured the right to drive their cars, free from the risk of seizure or fine for non-payment of the tax. The de.
cision, in an appeal presented by the lawyers, was made by judge Roque Joaquim Volkweiss, from the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Justice of Rio Grande do Sul. In the judgment of the appeal, four months later, by majority, the 2nd Chamber rejected the Appeal, maintaining the demand for payment of the tax. But the examination of the merits of the request for compensation between Phone Number List tax due and credit of fees continued in the first instance. In the action, the lawyers argue with the inequality of conditions between the taxpayer and the Public Treasury: “The government does not pay, but wants to receive; If y.
ou don't receive it, you can punish it, but if you don't pay your own obligations, nothing happens to you. Is this fair?” they question. The state of Rio Grande do Sul claimed that lawyers should not obtain compensation, because the legal provision authorizing the state law in Rio Grande do Sul has its effectiveness suspended. They also argued that, according to article 170 of the CTN, compensation of the tax credit is only allowed to the taxpayer of the tax obligation, and that if compensation were applicable, the lawyer would not be able to do it. Since the state's creditor is only the lawyer. Judge Gisele Azambuja said that compensation in tax matters is provided for in article 1,009 of the Civil Cod.
cision, in an appeal presented by the lawyers, was made by judge Roque Joaquim Volkweiss, from the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Justice of Rio Grande do Sul. In the judgment of the appeal, four months later, by majority, the 2nd Chamber rejected the Appeal, maintaining the demand for payment of the tax. But the examination of the merits of the request for compensation between Phone Number List tax due and credit of fees continued in the first instance. In the action, the lawyers argue with the inequality of conditions between the taxpayer and the Public Treasury: “The government does not pay, but wants to receive; If y.
ou don't receive it, you can punish it, but if you don't pay your own obligations, nothing happens to you. Is this fair?” they question. The state of Rio Grande do Sul claimed that lawyers should not obtain compensation, because the legal provision authorizing the state law in Rio Grande do Sul has its effectiveness suspended. They also argued that, according to article 170 of the CTN, compensation of the tax credit is only allowed to the taxpayer of the tax obligation, and that if compensation were applicable, the lawyer would not be able to do it. Since the state's creditor is only the lawyer. Judge Gisele Azambuja said that compensation in tax matters is provided for in article 1,009 of the Civil Cod.